The effectiveness of stepwise discriminant analysis ...

Object Details

View

Title Information
The effectiveness of stepwise discriminant analysis as a follow up procedure to a significant MANOVA using both the F-statistic and partial R-square criterion

Name:Personal
Chandran, Raj K.
Role :Text(marcrelator)
creator

Name:Personal
Mundfrom, Dan J.
Role :Text(marcrelator)
thesis advisor

Name:Personal
Perrett, Jamis J.
Role :Text
committee member

Name:Personal
Schaffer, Jay R,
Role :Text
committee member

Name:Personal
Heiny, Robert L.
Role :Text
committee member

Name:Corporate
Applied Statistics & Research Methods
Role :Text(marcrelator)
sponsor

Name:Corporate
University of Northern Colorado
Role :Text(marcrelator)
degree grantor

typeOfResource
text
genre(marcgt)
Thesis
Origin Information Place

University of Northern Colorado
(keyDate="yes")
2009-05
Place :Text
Greeley (Colo.)

2009-05


Language :Text
English

Physical Description
199 pages

born digital

abstract
This study examined the effectiveness of stepwise discriminant analysis (SWDA) using the F-statistic and Partial R-square criterion as a follow up analysis to a significant MANOVA. Monte Carlo simulations were conducted, and 7,128 scenarios were examined using different combinations of levels of number of MANOVA dependent variables, sample size, population correlation matrices, effect sizes, alpha significance levels and Partial R-square correlations. The two group case of MANOVA was considered, and simulations were run under the assumptions of multivariate normality, homogeneity of variance-covariance matrices, and linearity among all pairs of predictors within each group. This study has shown that SWDA is a viable option as a follow up analysis to a significant MANOVA if the correct conditions are met. It was found that SWDA performs well when the number of dependent variables with significantly differing means in each group is held low. Based on the results SWDA performs best when the number of significant dependent variables is three or less. Additionally, SWDA only works well when correlations between dependent variables are quite low. If correlations between dependent variables are held low, then SWDA can be used in situations where there are three dependent variables or less. SWDA can be used in situations where there are more than three dependent variables, but the number of significant dependent variables must be below four in order for SWDA to perform well. Another procedure could be used to gauge what that may be, then SWDA could be employed if the correct conditions are met. Because SWDA only works well when low correlations between dependent variables are present, it could be combined with another procedure, perhaps descriptive discriminant analysis to supplement situations when higher correlations are found. This dissertation has shown however, that using several univariate F-tests, also known as the "protected" F-test, should not be used after a significant MANOVA and SWDA should be used instead if the correct conditions are met.
note
[Released from embargo]
Related Item :series

Related Item :thesis(displayLabel="Degree Type")
doctoral

Related Item :thesis(displayLabel="Degree Name")
Ph.D.

identifier:Local
Chandran_unco_0161N_10000.pdf
Location (usage="primary display")
http://hdl.handle.net/10176/cogru:120

accessCondition:useAndReproduction
Copyright is held by the author.
Record Information languageOfCataloging :Text(ISO639-2B)
English
:Code(ISO639-2B)
eng

note:admin
note:bibliography
note:thesis(displayLabel="Degree Type")
PhD
note:thesis(displayLabel="Degree Name")
doctoral
Subject

Subject

Subject Name:Personal

Subject Name:Corporate

Subject

accessCondition:restrictionOnAccess
Title Information:Alternative


Subject

Subject
Stepwise Discriminant Analysis

Subject
Statistics

Subject
MANOVA

Subject
Follow-up Analysis

Subject
Post-hoc Analysis